# ETOOBUSY đźš€ minimal blogging for the impatient

# BĂ©zier curves

**TL;DR**

Where I re-discover a useful source for information, and that contributions might get lost.

For reasons that will hopefully be clear in a few days, Iâ€™m taking (again) a look at BĂ©zier curves. Thereâ€™s an excellent resource about them online, namely A Primer on BĂ©zier Curves.

Butâ€¦ wait a minute! I already knew this place from before, becauseâ€¦ I actually contributed to it about five years ago (I still have an oline version of the old site). Alas, in the meantime it underwent some re-writing, and it seems that my old contribution got lost đź¤”

The contribution was actually a minor one, but it was enough to tickle the not-so-little nit-picker in me at the time. In section Splitting curves using matrices there is:

[â€¦] the new end point is a mixture that looks oddly similar to a Bernstein polynomial of degree two

and my point is that *the new end point is a Bernstein polynomial*.

The key in this insight is that $z$ is actually the free variable in the parametric equations, which ranges in $[0,1]$. For this reason, $(z-1)$ is better expressed as $-(1-z)$, because it gives you an immediate view of whatâ€™s the real sign of the expression.

For this reason, then, the following expression:

\[z^2 \cdot P_3 - 2 \cdot z \cdot (z-1) \cdot P_2 + (z - 1)^2 \cdot P_1\]is best put as:

\[(1-z)^2 \cdot P_1 + 2 \cdot (1-z) \cdot z \cdot P_2 + z^2 \cdot P_3\]which also reveals itsâ€¦ **Bernstein** nature.

So there you have itâ€¦ **I know** (where to find info on) **BĂ©zier
curves**! (And now you do too).