ETOOBUSY 🚀 minimal blogging for the impatient
Although, admittedly, I already suspected it. From Cryptopals 38 - Offline dictionary attack on simplified SRP:
Sometimes I wish these challenges elaborated a bit more on the goals and the morale of what’s requested. You know, just to make sure that I’m not missing the full range of lessons.
I thought that the two main lessons were the following:
- SRP is prone to be attacked with a dictionary attack
- time and again, we’re proven that a weak password defies any effort.
and it turns out that I was wrong with both of them.
Before moving on, though, kudos to skaunov for both finding out what the real point of the challenge was and, more importantly for me, for gently notifing me about it. Writing stuff does indeed help. folks!
You might remember skaunov as the gentle reader who helped me correcting Cryptopals 25 - Break “random access read/write” AES CTR!
OK, back into the topic, the first lesson should be changed like this:
- Simplified SRP is prone to an offline dictionary attack
As pointed out here, simplifying the protocol using $B = g^b$:
[…] opens the protocol to the an active dictionary attack, carried out by an attacker who masquerades as a legitimate host and convinces Carol to make an authentication attempt.
So well… apologies to Full SRP for jumping to conclusions!
It turns out that it’s exactly the simplificaiton that makes it possible to do the dictionary attack that I then proceeded to describe in the previous post.
I’d argue that it’s not necessary for us (the attacker, Sue in the article) to intercept the legitimate salt in a real exchange between Carla and Steve, as it is one of the parameters we’re allowed to play with. At the end of the day, the protocol has the server side send the salt to the client side, and the client to use it.
The second lesson should probably turn into this instead:
- Full SRP protects weak passwords from this kind of unauthenticated server offline dictionary attack.
I would anyway add: weak passwords are still a bad idea, as they are prone to many other attacks (e.g. an online dictionary attack from us towards the server). So changing my comment on this specific instance does not really change my idea about the general approach.
Stay safe and secure!