TL;DR

Here we are with TASK #2 from The Weekly Challenge #136. Enjoy!

# The challenge

You are given a positive number $n. Write a script to find how many different sequences you can create using Fibonacci numbers where the sum of unique numbers in each sequence are the same as the given number. Fibonacci Numbers: 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89, … Example 1 Input:$n = 16
Output: 4

Reason: There are 4 possible sequences that can be created using Fibonacci numbers
i.e. (3 + 13), (1 + 2 + 13), (3 + 5 + 8) and (1 + 2 + 5 + 8).


Example 2

Input:  $n = 9 Output: 2 Reason: There are 2 possible sequences that can be created using Fibonacci numbers i.e. (1 + 3 + 5) and (1 + 8).  Example 3 Input:$n = 15
Output: 2

Reason: There are 2 possible sequences that can be created using Fibonacci numbers
i.e. (2 + 5 + 8) and (2 + 13).


# The questions

I have to admit that I sometimes don’t understand the challenge test immediately, and I thank the author for providing interesting examples.

So in this case my question is: can we reuse whatever we conjured up for task 1 in PWC077 and move on? Let’s assume… yes!

# The solution

So… let’s get our solution back from Fibonacci Sum part 2 and adapt it a tiny bit to just count how many different alternatives we have:

#!/usr/bin/env perl
use v5.24;
use warnings;
use English qw< -no_match_vars >;
use autodie;

main(shift || 1);

sub main {
my ($n) = @_; # compute the "basic" Zeckendorf decomposition of$n
my $lk = lekkerkerker($n);

# compute a "reasonable" decomposition into possible non-overlapping
# components
my @components;
for my $i (reverse 0 ..$#{$lk->{indexes}}) { my$index = $lk->{indexes}[$i];
my $low_index =$i ? $lk->{indexes}[$i - 1] : 0;
my $alts = alternatives($index, $low_index); push @components,$alts;
}

# compute all possible arrangements, reject those with overlaps and
# print the others
my $count = 0; nested_loops_recursive( \@components, sub { my %seen; my$sum = 0;
for my $constituent (@_) { for my$i (@$constituent) { return if$seen{$i}++; my$fi = $lk->{fibo}[$i];
$sum +=$fi;
}
}
die "sum mismatch ($sum vs$n)\n" unless $n ==$sum;
++$count; } ); say$count;
}

sub lekkerkerker {
my ($n) = @_; my @fibo = (1, 2); push @fibo,$fibo[-2] + $fibo[-1] while$fibo[-1] < $n; my$i = $#fibo; my @indexes; while ($n > 0) {
--$i while$fibo[$i] >$n;
unshift @indexes, $i;$n -= $fibo[$i];
}
return {
fibo => \@fibo,
indexes => \@indexes,
};
}

# split an input index into the Fibonacci array into possible alternative
# index sets representing the same Fibonacci number in alternative ways,
# down to a lower index $il sub alternatives { my ($i, $il) = @_; my @item = ($i);
my @retval = ([$i]); while ($i > $il + 1) { pop @item; push @item,$i - 1, $i - 2; push @retval, [@item];$i -= 2;
}
return \@retval;
}

# simplified from
# https://github.polettix.it/ETOOBUSY/2020/07/28/nested-loops-recursive/
sub nested_loops_recursive {
my ($dims,$cb, $accumulator) = @_;$accumulator = [] unless defined $accumulator; my$level = @{$accumulator}; if ($level == @{$dims}) { # fire callback!$cb->(@{$accumulator}); return; } for my$item (@{$dims->[$level]}) {
push @{$accumulator},$item;
nested_loops_recursive($dims,$cb, $accumulator); pop @{$accumulator};
}
return;
}


This is what I call reuse!

Going Raku requires some translation and making sure to listify arrays when needed, but nothing that we cannot address:

#!/usr/bin/env raku
use v6;

sub MAIN (Int:D $n where * > 0 = 1) { # compute the "basic" Zeckendorf decomposition of$n
my %lk = lekkerkerker($n); # compute a "reasonable" decomposition into possible non-overlapping # components my @components; for (0 .. %lk<indexes>.end).reverse ->$i {
my $index = %lk<indexes>[$i];
my $low_index =$i ?? %lk<indexes>[$i - 1] !! 0; my @alts = alternatives($index, $low_index); @components.push: @alts; } # compute all possible arrangements, reject those with overlaps and # print the others my$count = 0;
nested_loops_recursive(
@components,
sub (*@stuff) {
my %seen;
my $sum = 0; for @stuff ->$constituent {
for @$constituent ->$i {
return if %seen{$i}++; my$fi = %lk<fibo>[$i];$sum += $fi; } } die "sum mismatch ($sum vs $n)\n" unless$n == $sum; ++$count;
}
);
$count.put; } sub lekkerkerker (Int:D$n is copy) {
my @fibo = 1, 2;
push @fibo, @fibo[*-2] + @fibo[*-1] while @fibo[*-1] < $n; my$i = @fibo.end;
my @indexes;
while $n > 0 { --$i while @fibo[$i] >$n;
@indexes.unshift: $i;$n -= @fibo[$i]; } return ( fibo => @fibo, indexes => @indexes, ).hash; } sub alternatives (Int:D$i is copy where * >= 0, Int:D $il where * >= 0) { my @item =$i;
my @retval = [$i],; while$i > $il + 1 { @item.pop; @item.push:$i - 1;
@item.push: $i - 2; @retval.push: [@item.List];$i -= 2;
}
return @retval;
}

sub nested_loops_recursive (@dims, &cb, @accumulator = []) {
my $level = @accumulator.elems; if$level == @dims.elems { # fire callback!
&cb(@accumulator);
return;
}
for @dims[$level].List ->$item {
@accumulator.push: \$item;
nested_loops_recursive(@dims, &cb, @accumulator);
@accumulator.pop;
}
return;
}


As anticipated, it’s mostly a translation, with due differences.

Stay safe everybody!

Comments? Octodon, , GitHub, Reddit, or drop me a line!